December 24, 2008
Carcinogenic cellphones?
Scientists are crunching the numbers, and the results of their research may be bad news for cellphone users: Use a phone, get a brain tumor. According to Popular Science:
Nearly five decades ago, Americans learned that one of their most treasured habits—smoking—was lethal. This year, we could get more scary news, when scientists announce the results from Interphone, the largest-ever study to investigate whether cellphones cause cancer.
Interphone researchers are pooling and analyzing the results gathered from studies on 6,400 tumors sampled from patients in 13 countries. If the final results mirror the preliminary ones, the world’s three billion cellphone users might want to dial back their talk time.
Israeli researchers participating in Interphone found that people who use cellphones regularly are 50 percent more likely than non-users to develop brain tumors. And a joint Interphone analysis from the U.K., Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland reported a 40 percent increase in tumor risk in people who use cellphones for more than a decade; the study found no discernable risk for people who have used cellphones for fewer than 10 years.
No one yet knows specifically how cellphones could cause cancer. The radiation they emit has too little energy to cause genetic damage, but some scientists believe that it may have indirect effects that cause cells to proliferate uncontrollably. But there’s no consensus on these theories.
Scientists like David Carpenter, the director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany, who spoke about cellphone risks at a Congressional subcommittee hearing in September, are looking to Interphone for a definitive ruling on cellphone safety but have expressed frustration over the two-years-delayed results.
An answer from Interphone is crucial for public health, Carpenter says. Although a handful of studies have been published on cellphones over the past few years, most have been statistically useless. For one thing, they surveyed too few people. Additionally, the majority of studies focused on the effects of cellphone use after several years, but in most cases brain cancer takes a decade to develop. Interphone looks at the influence of both short- and long-term use. That’s not to say that the study is perfect.
Interphone defines “regular” use as one call, once a week. It’s possible that this definition underestimates the risk to people who use cellphones more frequently.
It's hard to imagine voluntarily returning to the days of communications inaccessibility, when we left our homes or desks and somehow endured cutting the Ma Bell umbilical cord. But, if the statistical link between brain tumors and cellphones is real, I'll toss that gadget in the bin, where it can join my smokes and my asbestos-lined underpants.
Posted by Mike Lief at December 24, 2008 07:16 AM
| TrackBack
Comments
Like the tobacco industry, the cellphone industry will deny, deny, deny until they sink in litigation. The devices haven't been around for very long so the long turn prognosis may be very bad for heavy cellphone users.
Children should have ear pieces. Boys should not carry them in their pockets for obvious reasons.
Posted by: Bill at December 24, 2008 03:24 PM